May 10, 2018 1 min read

Fuel Economy Standards: There is No Tradeoff with Safety, Cost and Fleet Turnover

R

CFA has undertaken an analysis of the relationship between increased vehicle fuel efficiency and safety, vehicle cost, fleet turnover, and sales, given these issues are part of the Trump/Pruitt team’s stated rationale for freezing gradually increasing fuel efficiency requirements intended to carry through to 2025, at year 2020. The original requirement was a true consensus standard in which the car companies, consumers, environmentalists, unions, and the government came to agreement in 2011 with implementation starting in 2012.

In what amounts to a rollback of the well-considered, money-saving standards, the Trump/Pruitt team has said that they jeopardize safety, hamper sales and raise costs. However, this report finds that newer, more fuel efficient vehicles have: 1) more safety features, 2) continue a strong upward trend in sales, 3) provide cost savings that eliminate price increases, and, in fact, 4) sell better as their fuel efficiency increases.

Download PDF

Our Subject Matter Experts

Related Articles

R
June 09, 2026 / Reports
Blueprint for a Consumer-First Congress
R
April 24, 2026 / Press Releases
Consumer and Environmental Organizations Applaud and Support California Energy Commission’s Fuel-Saving Tire Efficiency Standards
R
December 04, 2025 / Press Releases
Karim D. Marshall Joins CFA as New Director of Climate and Energy Policy
R
July 24, 2025 / Press Releases
California Drivers Spend an Extra $180 on Gas Due to Inefficient Replacement Tires