Product Safety

An Analysis of OHV Recalls: Increasing Number of OHVs Pulled from Market Due to Safety Concerns

An Analysis of OHV Recalls: Increasing Number of OHVs Pulled from Market due to Safety Concerns

A Consumer Federation of America (CFA) analysis of off highway vehicle (OHV) recalls found that over the past 10 years, there have been 92 OHV recalls, and the number of recalls has increased from two recalls in 2010 to 18 recalls in 2018 and currently three in 2019. OHVs include all-terrain vehicles (ATVs), recreational off-highway vehicles (ROVs), and utility task vehicles (UTVs). CFA’s analysis of U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) OHV recall reports since 2010, found that the highest number of recalls occurred during the past three and a half years, from January 1, 2016 through May 13, 2019.

In addition, CFA analysis of CPSC OHV recall reports from January 1, 2010 through May 13, 2019 found that 19 brands[1] were involved in the recalls, and the brand with the most recalls was Polaris.[2] CPSC reports identified at least 63 injuries and two deaths linked to OHVs that were subsequently recalled. Also, more than one million[3] OHVs were estimated to be sold and subsequently recalled.

Recall Volume by Brand and Year

From January 1, 2010 through May 13, 2019, a total of 92 recall notices were identified. Nineteen brands were involved in the notices, and the brand that had the most recall notices during the period was Polaris. Figure 1, below, shows the number of OHV recalls during the report period. In 2017, there were a total of 24 recalls—the highest number of recalls in a single year during the period analyzed. In 2019, thus far, there have been three recalls. In 2018, there were 17 recalls and in 2016, there were 14 recalls. In 2011, there was one recall, but the following year the number of recalls increased to nine, a nine-fold increase, which was the highest increase, between years, for the time period analyzed by CFA.

The OHV recalls involve 19 different brands. Figure 2, below, shows that Polaris had the most recalls, 28, while Kawasaki had the second highest number of recalls, eleven. BRP/Can-Am had the third highest number of recalls, nine.

*Arctic Cat issued three recall notices under the name Arctic Cat on March 2014, July 2015, and August 2016. In October 2017 and November 2017, Arctic Cat issued a recall but under the name Textron. According to Textron’s website, Textron announced it purchased Arctic Cat in March 2017. For the purposes of this analysis, the Textron recall for Arctic Cat was included under the name Arctic Cat.
**Different CPSC recall notices for Bad Boy Buggies differ on who is issuing the recall. On January 2017, Textron issued a recall for Bad Boy Buggies, and it was listed as the manufacturer of Bad Boy Buggies in the CPSC recall notice. On April 2014 and December 2011, Bad Boy Buggies issued two recalls for UTVs alongside E-Z-GO. E-Z-GO issued the two recalls for golf carts. Both Bad Boy Buggies and E-Z-GO are manufactured by Textron, according to the CPSC recall notices. For the purposes of this analysis, the recalls issued under Textron and E-Z-GO for Bad Boy Buggy products are included under the name Bad Boy Buggies.

Recalls Driven by Fire and Crash Hazards Posed by Fuel, Steering, and Throttle Issues

There are numerous reasons why OHVs have been recalled, and CFA was able to identify some patterns. For example, over the past ten years, the top three hazards responsible for the recalls were broadly related to fuel, steering, and throttle issues which pose fire and crash hazards. Of the 92 recalls, fuel-related fire hazards were associated with the highest number of recalls, 21 (23%). The second most common hazards were steering and throttle related issues, which made up 11 recalls each (12%). These top three hazards represent nearly half of all hazards that led to recalls (47%).

Examples of fuel-related fire hazards include the fuel tap leaking, fuel gauge problems, and the fuel filter leaking. Issues related to the throttle include the throttle failing to return to idle and the throttle cable melting. Examples of steering-related hazards include the steering shaft breaking and the electronic power steering unit malfunctioning.

Injuries and Deaths

Injuries and deaths were involved in more than one quarter of the OHV recalls. Out of the 92 recalls analyzed, 23 recalls (26%) involved at least one injury. Tragically, the most serious involved two deaths. The most recent death occurred in January 2017 and involved the rollover of an OHV that was subsequently recalled because it did not have seatbelts, resulting in the death of a 14-year-old passenger. The second death occurred in April 2016 on an OHV that caught fire (the specific part of the vehicle that caught fire was not identified) and then rolled over, resulting in the death of a 15-year-old passenger.

There were 63 injuries included in the recall notices. The CPSC did not always identify the severity of the injuries, but of the 63 injuries included, there were at least two severe injuries. One individual suffered a serious leg injury after a rollover incident (the vehicle in this incident was part of the same recall as the January 2017 death above). And the second severe injury included a young child who suffered severe burns after an ROV caught fire (this recall noted that an additional five people suffered burn injuries but did not label them severe).

1,171,198 Vehicles Subsequently Recalled were Sold

For every recall issued, the CPSC estimates the number of impacted vehicles sold. For the 92 recalls analyzed, the CPSC estimates that 1,171,198 vehicles subsequently recalled were sold. The recalls that involved the largest number of OHVs were two Polaris recalls, one John Deere recall, and one American Honda recall. The Polaris RZR ROV recall impacted approximately 133,000 vehicles, in April 2016, and was due to the risk of the vehicle catching fire and involved the largest number of vehicles recalled during the period analyzed.

The second Polaris RZR ROV recall, due to heat shield problems, occurred in April 2018 and impacted approximately 107,000 vehicles, the second highest number of recalls. The John Deere Crossover Gator UTV recall impacted 68,300 vehicles in December 2017 due to steering shaft problems and involved the third highest number of recalls. The American Honda Pioneer ROV recall impacted 65,000 vehicles in May 2018 due to overheated muffler involved the fourth highest number of recalls.

Investigation into Cause of Increasing Recalls Needed

OHVs are powerful vehicles that can pose safety risks to OHV drivers and passengers even during seemingly low risk conditions. But when drivers are unwittingly using defective OHVs, the safety risk increases even more. More defective vehicles being used means more potential injuries and deaths.

OHV companies must do everything necessary to ensure the safety of their products. While we applaud companies for taking responsibility and recalling their products, problems should be identified before the products enter the marketplace and pose risks to consumers. This analysis identified that more OHV recalls have been occurring more recently. These recalled OHVs have been involved in incidents resulting in at least two deaths and 63 injuries. The CPSC must investigate why the number of OHV recalls are increasing and take steps, along with OHV manufacturers, to prevent these tragedies and improve the safety of these vehicles.

[1] Brand, is used to denote the type of OHV being recalled. While the brand is sometimes synonymous with the manufacturer, it is sometimes the name of an OHV produced by a manufacturer of a different name.  In some instances, it is not clear from the recall notice who the manufacturer is.
[2] A single CPSC recall notice can include a single model or multiple models, as well as a single model year or multiple model years, or any combination of these factors.
[3] There were five CPSC recall notices that included golf carts alongside OHVs. The CPSC recall notices did not separate the total units of the OHV products from the golf cart products. Therefore this total includes some units of golf carts.


Appendix: Links to CPSC OHV Recall Reports

From January 1, 2010 through May 13, 2019

Recall Date Company Link
3/14/2019 Kawasaki
3/5/2019 Arctic Cat
3/5/2019 Arctic Cat
12/6/2018 Kawasaki
11/8/2018 American Honda
10/31/2018 CFMOTO
10/24/2018 Cub Cadet
9/11/2018 John Deere
9/26/2018 CFMOTO
9/5/2018 Polaris
8/27/2018 Polaris
8/23/2018 American Landmaster
8/8/2018 Bobcat
8/8/2018 Polaris
6/29/2018 BRP
5/15/2018 American Honda
4/19/2018 Polaris
4/19/2018 Polaris
4/10/2018 BRP
4/2/2018 Polaris
12/21/2017 John Deere
12/21/2017 Polaris
11/30/2017 Kubota
11/16/2017 Arctic Cat
10/30/2017 Polaris
10/27/2017 Arctic Cat
10/17/2017 Polaris
9/6/2017 Kawasaki
8/22/2017 Polaris
8/10/2017 Kawasaki
8/8/2017 Polaris
7/25/2017 Polaris
7/19/2017 Polaris
7/18/2017 Polaris
7/6/2017 Cub Cadet
6/20/2017 Kawasaki
5/9/2017 American Honda
4/13/2017 Polaris
4/13/2017 Polaris
4/11/2017 John Deere
3/21/2017 Polaris
3/2/2017 Polaris
1/12/2017 BRP
1/11/2017 Bad Boy Buggies
12/29/2016 Polaris
11/22/2016 BRP
9/15/2016 Polaris
9/1/2016 Polaris
8/23/2016 Arctic Cat
7/28/2016 John Deere
7/7/2016 Kawasaki
5/12/2016 Kubota
5/10/2016 American Honda
5/5/2016 BRP
4/29/2016 Cub Cadet
4/19/2016 Polaris
4/13/2016 Yamaha
3/9/2016 KYMCO
12/15/2015 Kawasaki
12/10/2015 Polaris
10/7/2015 BRP
10/6/2015 Polaris
8/13/2015 American SportWorks
7/28/2015 Arctic Cat
7/23/2015 Polaris
5/26/2015 BRP
4/14/2015 Yamaha
2/3/2015 Gibbs Sports Amphibians
10/16/2014 American Honda
9/25/2014 Bad Boy Buggies
7/30/2014 Kawasaki
4/22/2014 Bad Boy Buggies
3/18/2014 Arctic Cat
2/25/2014 Polaris
6/19/2013 Polaris
2/24/2013 John Deere
1/29/2013 BRP
1/20/2013 John Deere
1/20/2013 BRP
1/9/2013 Polaris
11/15/2012 John Deere
10/2/2012 Kubota
9/19/2012 Club Car
8/22/2012 Kawasaki
4/26/2012 Kawasaki
4/10/2012 Club Car
3/15/2012 Kawasaki
1/26/2012 KYMCO
1/26/2012 Columbia ParCar
12/14/2011 Bad Boy Buggies
11/23/2010 Cub Cadet
7/8/2010 American Suzuki Motor Corp