CFA Joins Global Civil Society Organizations in Asking UNCITRAL to Reject Investor-State Dispute Settlement
In a letter to United Nations Commission on International Trade Law member states, hundreds of global civil society organizations including CFA express unequivocal opposition to the investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) regime and the far-reaching rights for foreign investors enshrined in trade and investment treaties. ISDS and the investment treaty regime empower one class of interests – multinational corporations and investors – to sue governments outside of domestic court systems for unlimited amounts of compensation, including for the loss of expected future profits. A vast array of domestic laws, court rulings, regulations, and other government actions are subject to such attack, including non-discriminatory policies enacted in order to promote public welfare.
Download PDF
Our Subject Matter Experts
Related Articles
CFA Urges FTC to Prohibit Harmful Surveillance Pricing Practices
CFA Letter to Congress Opposing “AI Sandbox” Provision in CLARITY Act
CFA Letter to FTC Regarding Proposed Policy Statement Concerning the Suppression of Accuracy in Artificial Intelligence Systems