November 05, 2019 1 min read

CFA and Other Groups Argue that Intent is Not Required Under State UDAP Statutes

CFA TC

In an amicus brief filed with a Pennsylvania Court, CFA and other groups said that when consumers are harmed by unfair and deceptive acts or practices by businesses, they are not required to prove intent to deceive in order to obtain relief under state unfair and deceptive acts or practices statutes.

Related Articles

CFA TC
June 18, 2026 / Testimony & Comments
CFA Joins Letter Urging Congress to Include Warrant Requirement for Accessing Americans’ Communications and Close Data Broker Loophole in FISA Section 702 Extension
CFA TC
June 17, 2026 / Press Releases
CFA Statement on FTC Lawsuit Against WPATH
CFA TC
June 09, 2026 / Reports
Blueprint for a Consumer-First Congress
CFA TC
April 14, 2026 / Testimony & Comments
CFA Supports FTC Renewing Click to Cancel Rule