Issue categories:
November 05, 2019
•
1 min read
CFA and Other Groups Argue that Intent is Not Required Under State UDAP Statutes
In an amicus brief filed with a Pennsylvania Court, CFA and other groups said that when consumers are harmed by unfair and deceptive acts or practices by businesses, they are not required to prove intent to deceive in order to obtain relief under state unfair and deceptive acts or practices statutes.
Our Subject Matter Experts
Related Articles
September 25, 2026
/ Testimony & Comments
CFA Urges FTC to Prohibit Harmful Surveillance Pricing Practices
August 05, 2026
/ Testimony & Comments
CFA Letter to Congress Opposing “AI Sandbox” Provision in CLARITY Act
July 31, 2026
/ Testimony & Comments
CFA Letter to FTC Regarding Proposed Policy Statement Concerning the Suppression of Accuracy in Artificial Intelligence Systems
July 01, 2026
/ Testimony & Comments