November 05, 2019 1 min read

CFA and Other Groups Argue that Intent is Not Required Under State UDAP Statutes

CFA TC

In an amicus brief filed with a Pennsylvania Court, CFA and other groups said that when consumers are harmed by unfair and deceptive acts or practices by businesses, they are not required to prove intent to deceive in order to obtain relief under state unfair and deceptive acts or practices statutes.

Related Articles

CFA TC
July 01, 2026 / Testimony & Comments
CFA Leads Request for Investigation into Compass-MRED Agreement and Related Anti-Consumer and Civil Rights Harms
CFA TC
June 29, 2026 / Press Releases
CFA Statement on US Supreme Court Trump v Slaughter Ruling
CFA TC
June 18, 2026 / Testimony & Comments
CFA Joins Letter Urging Congress to Include Warrant Requirement for Accessing Americans’ Communications and Close Data Broker Loophole in FISA Section 702 Extension
CFA TC
June 17, 2026 / Press Releases
CFA Statement on FTC Lawsuit Against WPATH