June 15, 2023 1 min read

Auto Advocates File Amicus Brief in California Supreme Court

CFA TC

CFA joined a group of advocates, legal aid and pro bono attorneys, and researchers in an amicus brief asking the California Supreme Court to reverse a decision which jeopardizes California’s strong consumer protections for car buyers. California’s Song-Beverly Act has historically provided relief to the thousands of consumers who buy used cars that turn out to be a “lemon” when the car is under the factory warranty. The California Court of Appeals’ ruling incorrectly finds that instead of being entitled to a refund or replacement for a lemon, consumers would be forced to drive and pay for dangerous defective vehicles. Advocates urge the California Supreme Court to reverse this decision and uphold the intent of Song-Beverly to protect car buyers from hazardous vehicles.

Related Articles

CFA TC
August 05, 2026 / Testimony & Comments
CFA Letter to Congress Opposing “AI Sandbox” Provision in CLARITY Act
CFA TC
July 31, 2026 / Testimony & Comments
CFA Letter to FTC Regarding Proposed Policy Statement Concerning the Suppression of Accuracy in Artificial Intelligence Systems
CFA TC
July 01, 2026 / Testimony & Comments
CFA Leads Request for Investigation into Compass-MRED Agreement and Related Anti-Consumer and Civil Rights Harms
CFA TC
June 29, 2026 / Press Releases
CFA Statement on US Supreme Court Trump v Slaughter Ruling