March 31, 2015 1 min read

Group Petition to CPSC to Adopt Rules for Toxic Flame Retardant Chemicals

CFA TC

To the extent that their health effects have been studied, specific organohalogen flame retardants have been found to present unacceptable risks and have often been discontinued.  Compelling evidence shows that this class of chemicals is inherently toxic.  And experience shows that, as studies reveal the risks of existing flame retardants, manufacturers will continue to replace them with others that are not well studied, leaving consumers as victims of an endless game of toxic “whack‐a‐mole.”   Given the evidence that organohalogen flame retardants migrate from products and are absorbed by humans, and that these exposures – especially during the earliest stages of human life – are associated with serious adverse health impacts, CFA petitions the CPSC to regulate additive organohalogen flame retardants.

Our Subject Matter Experts

Related Articles

CFA TC
August 06, 2026 / Blogs
Strong Enforcement Tools Are Needed to Protect Americans from Unsafe Products
CFA TC
July 30, 2026 / Blogs
Modernization or Misstep? New Injury Surveillance and Personal Health Data Demands From the CPSC 
CFA TC
July 29, 2026 / Testimony & Comments
CFA Joins Consumer Groups in Opposing Confirmation of Lorenze, Sessions as CPSC Commissioners
CFA TC
July 21, 2026 / Press Releases
Consumer Groups Oppose Confirmation of Lorenze, Sessions as CPSC Commissioners