June 30, 2022 1 min read

Supreme Court Decision in West Virginia vs. Environmental Protection Agency Will Limit Ability to Protect the Public

PR

Washington, D.C. – Today the United States Supreme Court released their decision in the case of West Virginia vs. EPA. The court blocked the ability of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to regulate greenhouse gas emissions which impact climate change while still allowing the EPA to use its authority to address climate change.

“This decision not only impacts the ability of the EPA to regulate under the Clean Air Act, but also could have vast implications on rulemaking by agencies generally,” stated Rachel Weintraub, Legislative Director and General Counsel with Consumer Federation of America.  “Americans depend upon all of our regulatory agencies to protect them: to ensure the air they breathe, products they purchase and food they eat are safe, and that our financial services and marketplace are fair. This decision gives regulated market participants and others who want to oppose regulations another tool to thwart necessary protections.”


Contact: Rachel Weintraub, 202-939-1012

Related Articles

PR
August 28, 2026 / Blogs
The California Energy Commission’s Tire Fix Will Save Drivers Money. Other States Should Adopt Similar Standards
PR
August 21, 2026 / Blogs
Exploding Diarrhea and Ultra-Processed Foods: Two Public Health Problems, One Common Cause
PR
August 19, 2026 / Press Releases
CFA and Consumer and Environmental Organizations Applaud and Support California Energy Commission’s Fuel-Saving Tire Efficiency Standards
PR
August 19, 2026 / Testimony & Comments
CFA Testifies Before the California Energy Commission in Support of the Replacement Tire Efficiency Program Rulemaking