June 24, 2005 • 1 min read

Statement of Carol Tucker Foreman on Positive BSE Test Results

PR

“Now we know why USDA resisted having the suspect animal subjected to the most sophisticated BSE test.  They were afraid the truth would come out.  The public and the industry know that this animal was infected with BSE only because the USDA office of inspector general insisted that the additional test be done.

“For over a week the industry has complained bitterly that it was ‘unfair’ and ‘unscientific’ to perform the most sophisticated scientific test.  The history of BSE in the U.S. has been characterized by unsupportable assurances of no risk, inadequate regulatory remedies and the adoption by government and industry of ‘sympathetic science.’   This will result in further diminution of public confidence in USDA’s capacity to put public health ahead of industry convenience and trade imperatives.”

Related Articles

PR
October 06, 2026 / Reports
Food Advertising Subsidy Reform: A Win-Win for Fiscal and Public Health
PR
October 06, 2026 / Press Releases
New CFA Report Highlights Opportunity for States to Raise Revenue by Ending Advertising Tax Subsidies for Big Food
PR
September 21, 2026 / Blogs
Food Safety and Corruption
PR
September 14, 2026 / Blogs
Why Country of Origin Labeling Matters