June 23, 2022 2 min read

Bank, Credit Union and Consumer Groups Support Committee Vote to Close the Industrial Loan Company Loophole

PR

Washington, D.C. The U.S. House Committee on Financial Services convened today to mark up a series of proposed laws, including a bill to close the industrial loan company (ILC) loophole. The ILC loophole allows Big Tech and other nonbank companies to offer financial products and services without complying with the safeguards and oversights required of bank holding companies. The “Close the ILC Loophole Act” (H.R. 5912) now heads to the floor for consideration by the entire legislative body.

Americans for Financial Reform, Bank Policy Institute, Center for Responsible Lending, Consumer Federation of America, Credit Union National Association, Independent Community Bankers of America, Mid-Size Bank Coalition of America, National Association of Federally-Insured Credit Unions, National Community Reinvestment Coalition, National Consumer Law Center and U.S. PIRG previously submitted a joint letter of support to the Committee in advance of the vote, and issued the following statement in response to its passage:

With today’s vote, the Committee is one step closer to strengthening the financial system by closing the ILC loophole, and we call on Congress to take up this legislation without delay. The current version of the legislation helps preserve the longstanding separation between banking and commerce and restricts Big Tech companies from circumventing existing rules by using a loophole to enter the banking system. This effort reflects the extraordinary bipartisan work by Representatives Jesús “Chuy” García and Lance Gooden to collaborate with stakeholders to reach a solution, and it serves as an acknowledgment that there is no justifiable reason for two similar institutions offering indistinguishable products or services to be treated differently under the law.

The legislation would help eliminate legal disparities between bank holding companies and ILC parent companies by imposing consistent regulatory and supervisory expectations.

To learn more, please click here.


Contact: Rachel Gittleman, rgittleman@consumerfed.org

Related Articles

PR
May 29, 2026 / Testimony & Comments
CFA Submits Comments to Congress on How Senior Fraud-Protection Accounts Can Prevent Scams
PR
May 14, 2026 / Press Releases
CFA Statement on Senate Joint Resolutions of Disapproval of Trump Administration’s Rollbacks of CFPB
PR
April 22, 2026 / Press Releases
CFA Statement in Response to CFPB Final Rule Amending ECOA
PR
April 16, 2026 / Testimony & Comments
Consumer Groups Oppose Attacks on CFPB Complaint Database