April 24, 2008 • 1 min read

State Automobile Insurance Regulation: A National Quality Assessment and In-Depth Review of California's Uniquely Effective Regulatory System

R

In response to the advocacy of the insurance industry, Congress has considered several significant pieces of legislation in recent years to weaken state insurance regulation and replace it with looser federal oversight. One prominent proposal would allow insurers to choose whether to be regulated at the state or federal level, known as an optional federal charter. Another would have blocked the states from regulating insurance rates. In an attempt to staunch the political support for federal deregulatory measures, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) has urged states to adopt a number of steps in the last decade to reduce consumer protections for automobile and homeowner’s insurance. Meanwhile, industry-sponsored academics have generated a spate of reports that seek to discredit rate regulation in particular as anti-consumer and to offer economic arguments for deregulation.

Related Articles

R
October 05, 2026 / Testimony & Comments
Letter Urging the California Supreme Court to Decide a Case Against USAA's Unfair Discrimination Against Enlisted Servicemembers
R
September 22, 2026 / Testimony & Comments
CFA Urges States to Follow Texas's Lead and Ban Price Optimization in Insurance

 

R
September 01, 2026 / Testimony & Comments
CFA Submits Comments on Draft Colorado Bulletin No. B-5.57, Concerning Use of Aerial Imagery by Insurers in Decision Making
R
August 13, 2026 / Press Releases
Tips for Consumers to Get Fair Insurance Treatment After the Washington State Wildfires