April 24, 2008 • 1 min read

State Automobile Insurance Regulation: A National Quality Assessment and In-Depth Review of California's Uniquely Effective Regulatory System

R

In response to the advocacy of the insurance industry, Congress has considered several significant pieces of legislation in recent years to weaken state insurance regulation and replace it with looser federal oversight. One prominent proposal would allow insurers to choose whether to be regulated at the state or federal level, known as an optional federal charter. Another would have blocked the states from regulating insurance rates. In an attempt to staunch the political support for federal deregulatory measures, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) has urged states to adopt a number of steps in the last decade to reduce consumer protections for automobile and homeowner’s insurance. Meanwhile, industry-sponsored academics have generated a spate of reports that seek to discredit rate regulation in particular as anti-consumer and to offer economic arguments for deregulation.

Related Articles

R
October 20, 2026 / Press Releases
Top Ten Insurance CEOs Earned Over $155 Million in Compensation in 2025, While Consumers Struggled to Pay Premiums
R
October 20, 2026 / Blogs
Insurance Companies Claim They Have to Hike Consumers’ Premiums. Their CEO Compensation, Dividends, and Advertising Costs Tell a Different Story
R
October 16, 2026 / Press Releases
Tips for Consumers to Get Fair Treatment from Insurance Companies After Hurricane Isaias
R
October 05, 2026 / Testimony & Comments
Letter Urging the California Supreme Court to Decide a Case Against USAA's Unfair Discrimination Against Enlisted Servicemembers