October 10, 2019 1 min read

Why The Case Of “The Irregulators V. The FCC” Is So Important To Consumers

B

In a major analysis published almost three years ago, CFA showed that consumers are being overcharged over $70 billion a year for their broadband, wireless and television services. Today the Irregulators filled their reply brief in the legal challenges to the FCC’s decision to continue its fraudulent accounting rules that allocate two-thirds of the costs of the communications network to the intrastate local service jurisdiction, even though today two-thirds of communications revenue is collected in the interstate jurisdiction.

The FCC'S Fraudulent Accounting Rules Explained

Related Articles

B
August 05, 2026 / Testimony & Comments
CFA Letter to Congress Opposing “AI Sandbox” Provision in CLARITY Act
B
July 31, 2026 / Testimony & Comments
CFA Letter to FTC Regarding Proposed Policy Statement Concerning the Suppression of Accuracy in Artificial Intelligence Systems
B
July 01, 2026 / Testimony & Comments
CFA Leads Request for Investigation into Compass-MRED Agreement and Related Anti-Consumer and Civil Rights Harms
B
June 29, 2026 / Press Releases
CFA Statement on US Supreme Court Trump v Slaughter Ruling