October 10, 2019 1 min read

Why The Case Of “The Irregulators V. The FCC” Is So Important To Consumers

B

In a major analysis published almost three years ago, CFA showed that consumers are being overcharged over $70 billion a year for their broadband, wireless and television services. Today the Irregulators filled their reply brief in the legal challenges to the FCC’s decision to continue its fraudulent accounting rules that allocate two-thirds of the costs of the communications network to the intrastate local service jurisdiction, even though today two-thirds of communications revenue is collected in the interstate jurisdiction.

The FCC'S Fraudulent Accounting Rules Explained

Related Articles

B
July 01, 2026 / Testimony & Comments
CFA Leads Request for Investigation into Compass-MRED Agreement and Related Anti-Consumer and Civil Rights Harms
B
June 29, 2026 / Press Releases
CFA Statement on US Supreme Court Trump v Slaughter Ruling
B
June 18, 2026 / Testimony & Comments
CFA Joins Letter Urging Congress to Include Warrant Requirement for Accessing Americans’ Communications and Close Data Broker Loophole in FISA Section 702 Extension
B
June 17, 2026 / Press Releases
CFA Statement on FTC Lawsuit Against WPATH