September 25, 2012 1 min read

Coalition Comments to the FTC on Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule

CFA TC

Children’s Privacy Advocates generally support the Commission’s revised proposals, including the Commission’s proposed definition of “personal information” to include persistent identifiers used for functions other than or in addition to support for the internal operations of the website or online service. However, we oppose the proposed change in the definition of “directed to children,” because it would undercut the other beneficial proposals and lessen privacy protections for children. We also do not support the newly revised proposal to redefine “support for internal operations,” because the newly proposed definition would create a large loophole that could allow operators to engage in behavioral advertising to children.

Related Articles

CFA TC
August 20, 2026 / Press Releases
EPIC, CFA Release Surveillance Pricing Explainer
CFA TC
August 19, 2026 / Reports
Explaining Surveillance Pricing and Other Data-Driven Pricing Practices
CFA TC
August 05, 2026 / Testimony & Comments
CFA Letter to Congress Opposing “AI Sandbox” Provision in CLARITY Act
CFA TC
July 31, 2026 / Testimony & Comments
CFA Letter to FTC Regarding Proposed Policy Statement Concerning the Suppression of Accuracy in Artificial Intelligence Systems