CFA Opposes Adoption of the “Compendium of Reports on the Pricing of Personal Automobile Insurance"
The Consumer Federation of America strongly opposes the adoption of the Auto Study Group compendium of reports for several reasons. First, this document is not a compendium of reports by any means, but, instead, an assemblage of insurance industry and NAIC reports, including three that are more than fifteen years old. Further, the included documents and reports generally do not respond to the underlying purpose of the study group: “to review issues relating to low-income households and the auto insurance marketplace and to make recommendations as appropriate.” Nor does the compendium meet its own stated purpose of providing “a resource for state insurance regulators seeking to know more about issues concerning the availability and affordability of automobile insurance.”
Our Subject Matter Experts
Related Articles
Top Ten Insurance CEOs Earned Over $155 Million in Compensation in 2025, While Consumers Struggled to Pay Premiums
Insurance Companies Claim They Have to Hike Consumers’ Premiums. Their CEO Compensation, Dividends, and Advertising Costs Tell a Different Story
Tips for Consumers to Get Fair Treatment from Insurance Companies After Hurricane Isaias