May 17, 2018 1 min read

CFA and Center for Science in the Public Interest Ask for Commonsense Approach to Regulating Meat Alternatives

CFA TC

CFA and the Center for Science in the Public Interest submitted the following comments urging the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service to reject efforts by a beef industry trade group to prohibit use of the terms “meat” or “beef” on plant-based and cultured proteins marketed as alternatives to traditional meat. Earlier this year, the United States Cattlemen’s Association filed a petition asking USDA to restrict the use of “beef” and “meat” to products from “animals born, raised, and slaughtered in the traditional manner.” The comments recommend that the agency deny that petition, arguing that the agency need not ban specific words to ensure that labeling is clear and not misleading. The comments also point out that “the USCA has taken its ‘beef’ to the wrong agency” because plant-based foods are regulated by the Food and Drug Administration, not the USDA. On the subject of lab-grown or “cultured” meat, the comments point out that no such products are yet commercially available, and argue that the FDA and USDA should agree on which agency has jurisdiction to regulate these foods before either agency moves to restrict their labeling.

Download PDF

Related Articles

CFA TC
July 15, 2026 / Blogs
Will Cyclospora Spur a MANHEDA Movement?
CFA TC
July 08, 2026 / Testimony & Comments
Safe Food Coalition Opposes Farm Bill 2.0 Proposal to Deregulate Meat Inspection
CFA TC
July 07, 2026 / Blogs
Congress Takes a Stand on Trade
CFA TC
June 09, 2026 / Reports
Blueprint for a Consumer-First Congress