May 17, 2018 1 min read

CFA and Center for Science in the Public Interest Ask for Commonsense Approach to Regulating Meat Alternatives

CFA TC

CFA and the Center for Science in the Public Interest submitted the following comments urging the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service to reject efforts by a beef industry trade group to prohibit use of the terms “meat” or “beef” on plant-based and cultured proteins marketed as alternatives to traditional meat. Earlier this year, the United States Cattlemen’s Association filed a petition asking USDA to restrict the use of “beef” and “meat” to products from “animals born, raised, and slaughtered in the traditional manner.” The comments recommend that the agency deny that petition, arguing that the agency need not ban specific words to ensure that labeling is clear and not misleading. The comments also point out that “the USCA has taken its ‘beef’ to the wrong agency” because plant-based foods are regulated by the Food and Drug Administration, not the USDA. On the subject of lab-grown or “cultured” meat, the comments point out that no such products are yet commercially available, and argue that the FDA and USDA should agree on which agency has jurisdiction to regulate these foods before either agency moves to restrict their labeling.

Download PDF

Related Articles

CFA TC
May 20, 2026 / Testimony & Comments
Safe Food Coalition Tells Congress to Hold the Raw Milk
CFA TC
May 19, 2026 / Testimony & Comments
CFA urges FTC to act without further delay to protect consumers in online food delivery space
CFA TC
May 11, 2026 / Blogs
Some Commonsense Advice on Ultra-Processed Food
CFA TC
April 27, 2026 / Blogs
Moving USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service: DOGE 2.0?